### Introduction This article is meant to record my learning progress of Chapter 2 of "C++ Primer Plus 5". It primarily involves a deep dive into the source code analysis of the C++ library. Currently, I am a beginner and I am using the ChatGPT 3.5 model to aid in my learning. I initially intended to continue reading, but due to my limited familiarity with C++ and the complexity of the project, I've decided to take it slow. My goal is to be able to understand and implement everything from scratch once I have learned enough. Additionally, I have a plan to analyze the STL (Standard Template Library) source code. ### Summary of AI-Read Articles This article serves as a study record of Chapter 2 of "C++ Primer Plus." It mainly discusses the implementation principles of C++ regular expressions and the `std::regex_replace` standard library function. By dissecting the source code, it explains fundamental C++ concepts such as template syntax, static assertions, pre-processing compilation, and typedef alias definitions. Additionally, it mentions the learning plan for analyzing the STL source code. #### std::regex_replace Function Principle ```C++ // Try replacing 'X' using regex std::string cheese = "His X, How are you?"; // A string where we need to perform a replacement, 'X' is the value to replace std::regex reg("X"); // Declare a regular expression object std::string result = std::regex_replace(cheese, reg, "StarYuhen"); // Perform the replacement std::cout << result << std::endl; // Output the result ``` Here, we follow the source code: ```c++ template inline basic_string<_Ch_type, _St, _Sa> regex_replace(const basic_string<_Ch_type, _St, _Sa>& __s, const basic_regex<_Ch_type, _Rx_traits>& __e, const _Ch_type* __fmt, regex_constants::match_flag_type __flags = regex_constants::match_default) { basic_string<_Ch_type, _St, _Sa> __result; regex_replace(std::back_inserter(__result), __s.begin(), __s.end(), __e, __fmt, __flags); return __result; } ``` This is the syntax structure of `regex_replace`. Let's analyze it step by step. The article previously covered template syntax, so I won't delve into it again. ```C++ template ``` This part represents the template syntax in a straightforward manner and uses `inline` to reduce overhead by inserting code at the function position, as mentioned earlier. **Continuing the Analysis:** First, let's look at this code: ```c++ regex_replace(const basic_string<_Ch_type, _St, _Sa>& __s, const basic_regex<_Ch_type, _Rx_traits>& __e, const _Ch_type* __fmt, regex_constants::match_flag_type __flags = regex_constants::match_default) ``` Here, the first parameter is: * `const basic_string<_Ch_type, _St, _Sa>& __s` It's defining a reference parameter `__s` that represents a reference to the template string `basic_string<_Ch_type, _St, _Sa>&`. Let's examine the source code: ```c++ template class basic_string ``` Here, we find that the template for this class has the following parameters: - `_CharT` (the character type of the string) - `_Traits` (the allocator type of the string) - `_Alloc` (the storage type of the string) **Expanding Knowledge:** While examining the source code, we come across a special piece of code: ```c++ #if __cplusplus < 201103L typedef iterator __const_iterator; #else typedef const_iterator __const_iterator; #endif ``` This is the C++ preprocessor conditional compilation (`#if`, `#else`, `#endif`). It allows you to compile specific code based on conditions, making the program more flexible and portable. `typedef` is a keyword used to define aliases. In this part: ```c++ const basic_regex<_Ch_type, _Rx_traits>& __e ``` Let's take a look at the source code: ```c++ template> class basic_regex { public: static_assert(is_same<_Ch_type, typename _Rx_traits::char_type>::value, "regex traits class must have the same char_type"); ``` Here, we introduce a new concept: the `static_assert` statement. It's a compile-time assertion, similar to the `assert` function in Java. In this context: ```c++ is_same<_Ch_type, typename _Rx_traits::char_type>::value ``` It checks whether `_Ch_type` and `_Rx_traits::char_type` are the same. Now, looking at the third parameter: ```c++ const _Ch_type* __fmt ``` This is used to format the replacement string, and it can be considered the most important part of this statement. It can be thought of as a formatting statement for regular expressions. If we check the definition of `_Ch_type` in the source code: ```c++ template class regex_traits { public: typedef _Ch_type char_type; typedef std::basic_string string_type; typedef std::locale locale_type; ``` From the syntax, we can infer that: - `char_type` is an alias for `_Ch_type` and can be understood as the character type. - `string_type` is the type of `std::basic_string`, which is known as the string type. - `locale_type` is an alias for `std::locale`, and it's also the localization type. The third parameter is: ```c++ regex_constants::match_flag_type __flags = regex_constants::match_default ``` It defines it as an optional parameter. I find this interesting because I haven't learned this in C++ yet, so I researched to find out how to implement functions with default values. It's implemented as follows: ```c++ int FlagsDefault() { return 10 + 10; } // Default value parameter int flagsInt(int Int = FlagsDefault()) { return Int + 1; } int main() { std::cout << flagsInt(10) << std::endl; } ``` Here, if no parameter is passed, it adds 1 to the default value, otherwise, it adds 1 to the passed value. **Analyzing the Functional Code:** ```c++ basic_string<_Ch_type, _St, _Sa> __result; regex_replace(std::back_inserter(__result), __s.begin(), __s.end(), __e, __fmt, __flags); return __result; ``` It starts by declaring an empty string `__result`. Then, it uses an overloaded version of `regex_replace` and employs `std::back_inserter` iterator to gradually add to `__result`, which can be thought of as an increment operation. When examining the source code, we come across a new keyword: ```c++ /// The only way to create this %iterator is with a container. explicit _GLIBCXX20_CONSTEXPR back_insert_iterator(_Container& __x) : container(std::__addressof(__x)) { } ``` The `explicit` keyword is a specifier. It tells the compiler that it cannot perform implicit conversions. I haven't been able to delve into more advanced knowledge, so this is all I've gathered for now. Loading... ### Introduction This article is meant to record my learning progress of Chapter 2 of "C++ Primer Plus 5". It primarily involves a deep dive into the source code analysis of the C++ library. Currently, I am a beginner and I am using the ChatGPT 3.5 model to aid in my learning. I initially intended to continue reading, but due to my limited familiarity with C++ and the complexity of the project, I've decided to take it slow. My goal is to be able to understand and implement everything from scratch once I have learned enough. Additionally, I have a plan to analyze the STL (Standard Template Library) source code. ### Summary of AI-Read Articles This article serves as a study record of Chapter 2 of "C++ Primer Plus." It mainly discusses the implementation principles of C++ regular expressions and the `std::regex_replace` standard library function. By dissecting the source code, it explains fundamental C++ concepts such as template syntax, static assertions, pre-processing compilation, and typedef alias definitions. Additionally, it mentions the learning plan for analyzing the STL source code. #### std::regex_replace Function Principle ```C++ // Try replacing 'X' using regex std::string cheese = "His X, How are you?"; // A string where we need to perform a replacement, 'X' is the value to replace std::regex reg("X"); // Declare a regular expression object std::string result = std::regex_replace(cheese, reg, "StarYuhen"); // Perform the replacement std::cout << result << std::endl; // Output the result ``` Here, we follow the source code: ```c++ template<typename _Rx_traits, typename _Ch_type, typename _St, typename _Sa> inline basic_string<_Ch_type, _St, _Sa> regex_replace(const basic_string<_Ch_type, _St, _Sa>& __s, const basic_regex<_Ch_type, _Rx_traits>& __e, const _Ch_type* __fmt, regex_constants::match_flag_type __flags = regex_constants::match_default) { basic_string<_Ch_type, _St, _Sa> __result; regex_replace(std::back_inserter(__result), __s.begin(), __s.end(), __e, __fmt, __flags); return __result; } ``` This is the syntax structure of `regex_replace`. Let's analyze it step by step. The article previously covered template syntax, so I won't delve into it again. ```C++ template<typename _Rx_traits, typename _Ch_type, typename _St, typename _Sa> ``` This part represents the template syntax in a straightforward manner and uses `inline` to reduce overhead by inserting code at the function position, as mentioned earlier. **Continuing the Analysis:** First, let's look at this code: ```c++ regex_replace(const basic_string<_Ch_type, _St, _Sa>& __s, const basic_regex<_Ch_type, _Rx_traits>& __e, const _Ch_type* __fmt, regex_constants::match_flag_type __flags = regex_constants::match_default) ``` Here, the first parameter is: * `const basic_string<_Ch_type, _St, _Sa>& __s` It's defining a reference parameter `__s` that represents a reference to the template string `basic_string<_Ch_type, _St, _Sa>&`. Let's examine the source code: ```c++ template<typename _CharT, typename _Traits, typename _Alloc> class basic_string ``` Here, we find that the template for this class has the following parameters: - `_CharT` (the character type of the string) - `_Traits` (the allocator type of the string) - `_Alloc` (the storage type of the string) **Expanding Knowledge:** While examining the source code, we come across a special piece of code: ```c++ #if __cplusplus < 201103L typedef iterator __const_iterator; #else typedef const_iterator __const_iterator; #endif ``` This is the C++ preprocessor conditional compilation (`#if`, `#else`, `#endif`). It allows you to compile specific code based on conditions, making the program more flexible and portable. `typedef` is a keyword used to define aliases. In this part: ```c++ const basic_regex<_Ch_type, _Rx_traits>& __e ``` Let's take a look at the source code: ```c++ template<typename _Ch_type, typename _Rx_traits = regex_traits<_Ch_type>> class basic_regex { public: static_assert(is_same<_Ch_type, typename _Rx_traits::char_type>::value, "regex traits class must have the same char_type"); ``` Here, we introduce a new concept: the `static_assert` statement. It's a compile-time assertion, similar to the `assert` function in Java. In this context: ```c++ is_same<_Ch_type, typename _Rx_traits::char_type>::value ``` It checks whether `_Ch_type` and `_Rx_traits::char_type` are the same. Now, looking at the third parameter: ```c++ const _Ch_type* __fmt ``` This is used to format the replacement string, and it can be considered the most important part of this statement. It can be thought of as a formatting statement for regular expressions. If we check the definition of `_Ch_type` in the source code: ```c++ template<typename _Ch_type> class regex_traits { public: typedef _Ch_type char_type; typedef std::basic_string<char_type> string_type; typedef std::locale locale_type; ``` From the syntax, we can infer that: - `char_type` is an alias for `_Ch_type` and can be understood as the character type. - `string_type` is the type of `std::basic_string<char_type>`, which is known as the string type. - `locale_type` is an alias for `std::locale`, and it's also the localization type. The third parameter is: ```c++ regex_constants::match_flag_type __flags = regex_constants::match_default ``` It defines it as an optional parameter. I find this interesting because I haven't learned this in C++ yet, so I researched to find out how to implement functions with default values. It's implemented as follows: ```c++ int FlagsDefault() { return 10 + 10; } // Default value parameter int flagsInt(int Int = FlagsDefault()) { return Int + 1; } int main() { std::cout << flagsInt(10) << std::endl; } ``` Here, if no parameter is passed, it adds 1 to the default value, otherwise, it adds 1 to the passed value. **Analyzing the Functional Code:** ```c++ basic_string<_Ch_type, _St, _Sa> __result; regex_replace(std::back_inserter(__result), __s.begin(), __s.end(), __e, __fmt, __flags); return __result; ``` It starts by declaring an empty string `__result`. Then, it uses an overloaded version of `regex_replace` and employs `std::back_inserter` iterator to gradually add to `__result`, which can be thought of as an increment operation. When examining the source code, we come across a new keyword: ```c++ /// The only way to create this %iterator is with a container. explicit _GLIBCXX20_CONSTEXPR back_insert_iterator(_Container& __x) : container(std::__addressof(__x)) { } ``` The `explicit` keyword is a specifier. It tells the compiler that it cannot perform implicit conversions. I haven't been able to delve into more advanced knowledge, so this is all I've gathered for now. 最后修改:2023 年 11 月 06 日 © 允许规范转载 打赏 赞赏作者 支付宝微信 赞 如果觉得我的文章对你有用,请随意赞赏